//
you're reading...
Employer Branding

Employer Branding Fatigue

Employer branding has always had a battle to convince organisations – some more than others – that it is worth its place on the board room table. Arguments would rage that it had little value, it was just about having consistent communication and there were far better things on which to justify prising open the company coffers.

It has been hyped more than ever as some agencies have seen it as an opportunity to jump on the envisaged gravy train and tout their wares as the next employer branding experts. As a result inconsistent messages, a fragile economy and over-complicated analysis is resulting in something of a backlash.

Everyone’s an expert

It would appear that everyone has something to say about how ’employer branding should be done’. Now I’m not saying there aren’t many people making very worthwhile contributions to the debate and discussion on the topic, but I’m regularly bombarded by web links to articles (and maybe this is one of them!) on people sharing their insights and ideas like the concept was developed yesterday. It’s creating an element of fatigue that if you subscribe to many of the networking sites you will be familiar with and have to make some clear distinctions between generally worthwhile contributions and blatant self-promotion.

Large agency services

I personally feel some of the large agencies who have tried to offer ’employer branding’ as a product in its own right have a lot to answer for. Regardless of the fact that these are often the most poor at managing their own employer brand, they are also inconsistent with the way they deliver their ‘services’.

Employer branding never has been and never should be a ‘product’ but it is often packaged in such a way that it makes a convenient sales line when totting up the latest quarterly revenues.  The problem with this approach is that there is no long term devotion or commitment to the client need. The usual approach usually follows along the lines of persuading the client they need some focus groups followed up with a branding ‘solution’ and a creative face lift. All of which is fine, but does not fulfill the need for regular appraisal, revisiting and consultancy within the business to ensure its long term implementation. The job is done after the last presentation and there is no interest in maintaining a long term relationship. The client feels short changed and there is no consideration given to how performance, retention and recruitment are going to be effectively measured and benchmarked.

The need for reinvention

I’ve witness all kinds of reactions to employer branding. Those who just simply refuse to want to understand it, those who can’t be bothered, those who think its a dark science and simply people who don’t give a monkeys.

There are, and will be, agencies and consultancies who will become victims of their own downfall through over-theorising a concept that has derived its principals from already well-honed techniques in the areas of employee communications, cultural change and basic good management of an organisation’s reputation through its talent market and employee engagement.

I use the term ’employer branding’ because it is important in identifying how an organisation manages its relationships with its potential recruits and existing employees. The real and the perceived experience of what that organisation is like to work for. In its simplest form, that is it. The communciation that is involved to deliver, manage and enhance on the promise alongside a long term commitment to reviewing and managing feedback determines how successfully the organisation manages its people policy.

Looking ahead

The world is changing. People’s expectations are changing and the recruitment and employment market is moulding a future that will be very different to the landscape that existed before the recession. We need to change and adapt to this and look to innovative and interesting ways to manage the employer brand. Experience is a good thing, but experience is also only what we have learnt from the past and can resist inventive ways of managing the future.

Advertisements

About Nick Price

Employer branding and communications, insight and engagement, talent attraction and HR analytics

Discussion

One thought on “Employer Branding Fatigue

  1. True, true, true. Great article.

    I’ve just spent a year in Sydney working as an art director working heavily within recruitment advertising.

    I found that employer branding was being used as a buzz word and sold as this neat little package. It was hugely frustrating as a creative to see the process before me – all this lovely research, great client feedback and employee engagement at the focus groups and workshops.

    When it came to the creative execution it was all to often that I received a brief asking for ‘press ads, a poster and a postcard’. Sometimes this was because of weak account management, and sometimes ‘because we’re in a recession’.

    EB is more than this. I think it’s a long term investment, and I agree that it should be revisited periodically to make sure it’s on track with the brand, the employees and the candidates that it is attracting.

    Posted by Ben Da Costa | September 23, 2009, 6:53 pm

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Follow WhateverYouThink on WordPress.com

Twitter

Archives

%d bloggers like this: